<-- CHAPTER 3
HISTORY OF MOVEMENT
CONTENTS CHAPTER 5
NATION-WITHIN-A-NATION
-->

The Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement:
Roles of and Impacts on Non-Hawaiians

By Anthony Castanha, August 1996

CHAPTER 4

STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE

DESCRIPTION OF MODEL

The state-within-a-state model of Hawaiian self-government is essentially a form of integration within the current state of Hawai'i. This model would be comparable to the status of a county, but with a Hawaiian government and jurisdiction.1 A separate Hawaiian county could be established by the state legislature, just as political subdivisions such as counties, townships, and municipalities are provided for under the constitutions of the United States and the state of Hawai'i. The legislature could transfer existing assets (financial and land) from the Office of Hawaiian Affairs and the Department of Hawaiian Homelands to the new entity.2 The legislature could create
a Hawaiian state within the state of Hawai'i with powers to define membership and enact ordinances relating to taxes, land use and zoning, police and justice systems.

These powers also could be expanded beyond those now exercised by the counties to include administration of family court issues or police powers relating to the exercise of traditional Hawaiian rights.3

In comparison with the other models discussed in this thesis, state-within-a-state status would be easiest to reach since initiating it only requires an act by the legislature. Also, the transitional process of designating a land base and duplicating existing county structures would be relatively easy.4 Citizens within the new Hawaiian county would still be governed under existing U.S. and state constitutions. Regarding county jurisdiction, citizens would be subject to the laws and ordinances of the new county, separate from the jurisdiction of existing counties. Currently, there are many Native American tribes, not recognized by the U.S. federal government, with state-within-a-state status within their respective states.5 It should be noted that although the Office of Hawaiian Affairs does not endorse a particular model of self-government, OHA most closely resembles the state-within-a-state model as a state agency created by the state of Hawai'i.6

ADVOCATE-LEADERS

Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i and William Meheula are two advocates of the state-within-a-state model of self-government. Kamali'i is an Office of Hawaiian Affairs trustee and chairwoman of OHA's committee on land and sovereignty. She is a member of the Hawaiian Sovereignty Elections Council. Kamali'i is the original proponent of the state-within-a-state model. She has done research on the status of this model as a political subdivision or county within the jurisdiction of the current state of Hawai'i. She sees the state model as a "steppingstone" to a nation-within-a-nation form of government, based on the Native American Indian model.7 She presented the state-within-a-state model at the Ka Lahui Hawai'i "Symposium for Sovereignty" in February 1995.

Meheula is an attorney and President of the Native Hawaiian Bar Association. He is also a member of the HSEC. He supports the state-within-a-state model in this thesis because this concept of sovereignty comes closest to a Hawaiian trust or corporation, which he sees as a practical first step for Hawaiians to achieve greater autonomy. He believes the silent majority of Hawaiians are not ready for a new government, but Hawaiians want reparations and compensation for "theft of land and denial of self-determination for over 100 years." According to Meheula, the trust or corporation would be created by Hawaiians to settle claims against the state of Hawai'i and the U.S. federal government, and to establish a land base to fund Hawaiian programs which would eventually be turned over to a Hawaiian nation. He indicated the Hawaiian state-within-a-state would come under the jurisdiction of the state of Hawai'i.8

GENERAL QUESTIONS

Model
Q1. Which model of Hawaiian sovereignty do you support?

Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i - State-within-a-state leading to a nation-within-a-nation

William Meheula - State-within-a-state in the context of this thesis, preceded by a Hawaiian trust or corporation



Citizenship
Q2. Within that model, can non-Hawaiians obtain citizenship? What is the process of becoming a citizen?

Kamali'i responded that a Hawaiian convention, as proposed by the Hawaiian Sovereignty Elections Council, would determine whether non-Hawaiians could obtain citizenship. She is personally receptive to non-Hawaiians becoming citizens of the Hawaiian county, but believes this would not occur at the first convention. The process for non-Hawaiians obtaining citizenship would also be spelled out by the convention.

Meheula was receptive to non-Hawaiian inclusion in the Hawaiian entity, but as a second step after the resolution of Native Hawaiian claims, e.g., claims for Hawaiian ceded lands. He was uncertain at this time about the process of non-Hawaiians becoming citizens.



Property
Q3. What is the status of non-Hawaiians who are not citizens of the Hawaiian nation? Can they reside in Hawai'i, vote, own homes, land or businesses?

Kamali'i replied non-Hawaiian non-citizens could reside in the state-within-a-state. A Hawaiian convention would determine whether they could vote, or own homes, land and businesses. As a "percentage of the market value" of the ceded lands would comprise the land base of the state-within-a-state, non-Hawaiians with fee-simple title to homes and land in Hawai'i would not be affected by the new county. She pointed out that non-Hawaiians do not hold fee simple title to ceded lands, or homes on ceded lands, although some may be on leases from the state of Hawai'i.

Meheula said non-Hawaiian non-citizens could reside in the Hawaiian entity. Like Kamali'i, a Hawaiian convention would decide whether they could vote, or own homes, land and businesses. However, he personally believes the land base of the state-within-a-state, derived from the ceded lands, would be held in trust with no one owning land. He stressed the status of non-Hawaiian non-citizens outside the Hawaiian entity would not change at all, except that payment of Hawaiian claims for the improper title to and use of the ceded lands by the federal government would probably result in higher taxes for both Hawaiians and non-Hawaiians. But he believes all U.S. citizens should "share the burden so there would be a minimal impact on everybody."



Q4. Would non-Hawaiian residents who do not become citizens of the Hawaiian nation, but who owned homes, land and businesses at the time of the transition to nationhood, retain their property? Under what circumstances might they be evicted from property?

At the time of the transition to the Hawaiian county, Kamali'i affirmed that non-Hawaiian non-citizens with fee simple title to homes and land would retain their property. Regarding businesses, if one is leasing a business on ceded lands claimed by the Hawaiian county, the lease would transfer from the state of Hawai'i to the new county. When a lease expires, the terms of the lease could be renegotiated, she indicated. Concerning non-Hawaiians being evicted from property, Kamali'i's general response was negative, except for cases where the county may not want to renegotiate a lease. She said no one would be "kicked out" of Hawai'i.

Meheula replied "absolutely" regarding non-Hawaiians who do not become citizens of the Hawaiian entity retaining their homes, land and businesses. He said nobody would be evicted from property.



Q5. Can non-Hawaiian citizens of the Hawaiian nation retain homes, land and businesses? Under what circumstances might non-Hawaiian citizens be evicted from property?

For Kamali'i, the answer to question 4 would also apply to non-Hawaiian citizens of the Hawaiian county.

Meheula's answer to question 4 further applies to non-Hawaiian citizens in question 5.



Leadership and Governmental Positions
Q6. Can non-Hawaiian citizens hold leadership positions in the Hawaiian nation? In what capacity?

Kamali'i replied that a Hawaiian convention would determine whether non-Hawaiians could hold leadership positions in the Hawaiian county. Personally, she doesn't see this happening.

Meheula said he doesn't see non-Hawaiian leaders in the immediate future. In the context of a state-within-a-state, "Hawaiians must lead first." But if Hawaiians are moving towards independence, then non-Hawaiian leaders would inevitably emerge, according to him.



Q7. Can non-Hawaiian citizens hold governmental positions in the Hawaiian nation? In what capacity?

Once more the answer to the above question would be settled in a Hawaiian convention, Kamali'i indicated. She believes non-Hawaiians would probably hold similar positions as they do today in OHA.

Meheula replied non-Hawaiians could definitely hold consultant positions in the state-within-a-state, provided they are the most qualified for these positions.



Transitional Stage/Privileges
Q8. What is the primary role of non-Hawaiians within the transitional stage of your model?

Kamali'i said "all ethnic groups in Hawai'i should educate themselves" to understand the history of where they live and to know about the losses Native Hawaiians have endured for many years.

For Meheula, non-Hawaiians need to understand that Hawaiian claims, such as for the ceded lands, are valid. He emphasized Hawaiians are not only thinking about their pocketbooks, but seeking justice. Non-Hawaiians should "support and help Hawaiians receive just compensation from the U.S. federal government."



Q9. Would long-time non-Hawaiian residents and non-Hawaiians born and raised in Hawai'i be granted any special privileges as citizens of the Hawaiian nation?

Both Kamali'i and Meheula responded that any special privileges granted to non-Hawaiian citizens would be determined in a Hawaiian convention.



Benefits
Q10. How are the pensions, social security and Medicare benefits of non-Hawaiian citizens affected in the Hawaiian nation? Do you have a plan to implement similar programs?

Kamali'i said citizens of the Hawaiian county will always receive social security and Medicare benefits. Pensions would also not be affected since these are contracts with employers. She explained that health care programs would be different in the Hawaiian county compared to the current Westernized system. Because Hawaiians of the past did not have the health problems they have today, a result largely attributed to the change to a Westernized diet, Hawaiian programs in the future would intertwine Hawaiian forms of health care, e.g., the Wai'anae Diet, with Western forms.

Meheula does not see any of the above programs affecting citizens in the state-within-a-state or in the state of Hawai'i.



Immigration/Tourism
Q11. What are your views on immigration? Can non-Hawaiians immigrate to Hawai'i and become citizens of the Hawaiian nation?

Kamali'i replied the current immigration policy in the state of Hawai'i would not change. A Hawaiian convention would determine whether non-Hawaiians, who immigrate to Hawai'i, could become citizens of the Hawaiian county.

Meheula said non-Hawaiians who immigrate to Hawai'i could not automatically become citizens. He stressed that overpopulation in Hawai'i is already a major problem.



Q12. What are your views on tourism? Would tourism remain an economic market? In what capacity?

Kamali'i believes tourism would remain an economic market in the state of Hawai'i, but indicates it must be downscaled. She said we're heading in the wrong direction with tourism as the only economic market in Hawai'i. She emphasized that if tourists are going to come to Hawai'i, then more cultural education must be provided. Both Kamali'i and Meheula responded that tourism as an economic market within the Hawaiian county or entity would be determined in a Hawaiian convention.

SUMMARY-ANALYSIS

The state-within-a-state model of self-government is essentially a form of integration within the current state of Hawai'i. This model would provide Hawaiians a status comparable to a county, under existing and state and U.S. constitutions. The tables below summarize the information gathered from my interviews. I provide brief analyses in each of six main areas of the general questions. The analyses focus on consensus found among the advocate-leaders regarding roles of non-Hawaiians in the state-within-a-state model.

Table 4.1 STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE  

Citizenship
Leaders Q2. Can non-Hawaiians obtain citizenship? Q2. What is the Process of becoming a citizen?
Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i To be determined in a Hawaiian convention. She is personally receptive to non-Hawaiians becoming citizens but believes this would not occur at a first convention. To be determined in a Hawaiian convention
William Meheula He is receptive to non-Hawaiian inclusion in the Hawaiian entity but as a second step after the resolution of Native Hawaiian claims. Uncertain at this time

Table 4.1 examines whether non-Hawaiians can obtain citizenship in the state-within-a-state model, and the process of becoming a citizen. Both leaders interviewed could not confirm at this time whether non-Hawaiians could become citizens of the Hawaiian county. However, both were receptive to non-Hawaiian citizenship in the future. There was no consensus at this time regarding the process of becoming a citizen.

Table 4.2 STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE  

Property

Q3. What is the status of non-Hawaiians who are not citizens of the Hawaiian nation? Can they:

Leaders Reside in the Hawaiian county? Vote? Own homes? Own land? Own businesses?
Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i Yes To be determined in a Hawaiian convention To be deter- mined in a Hawaiian convention To be determined in a Hawaiian convention To be determined in a Hawaiian convention
William Meheula Yes To be determined in a Hawaiian convention To be determined in a Hawaiian convention To be determined in a Hawaiian convention To be determined in a Hawaiian convention

 Tables 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 primarily concern the area of property. Table 4.2 focuses on the period of time after implementation of the state-within-a-state model. Both leaders indicated that non-Hawaiian non-citizens could reside in the Hawaiian county, and a Hawaiian convention would determined whether they could vote, or own homes, land and businesses.

Table 4.3 STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE  

Property

Q4. Would non-Hawaiian residents who do not become citizens of the Hawaiian nation, but who owned homes, land and businesses at the time of the transition to nationhood, retain their property? Under what circumstances might they be evicted from property?

Leaders Retain homes? Retain land? Retain businesses? Evictions?
Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i Yes Yes Yes. If on the Hawaiian land base, leases would transfer to the Hawaiian county. Generally no
William Meheula Yes Yes Yes No

Tables 4.3 and 4.4 concern the transitional stage to achievement of the state-within-a-state model, and the issue of evictions. Both leaders in table 4.3 said non-Hawaiian residents who do not become citizens of the Hawaiian county would retain homes, land and businesses. According to Kamali'i, non-Hawaiians do not hold fee simple title to ceded lands, and homes on ceded lands, which would comprise the land base of the state-within-a-state. Regarding evictions, tables 4.3 and 4.4 indicate the two leaders generally agree that non-Hawaiians would not be evicted from property.

In table 4.4, both leaders replied that non-Hawaiians who become citizens of the state-within-a-state would retain homes, land and businesses.

Table 4.4 STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE  

Property

Q5. Can non-Hawaiian citizens of the Hawaiian nation retain homes, land and businesses? Under what circumstances might non-Hawaiian citizens be evicted from property?

Leaders Retain homes? Retain land? Retain businesses? Evictions?
Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i Yes Yes Yes. If on the Hawaiian land base, leases would transfer to the Hawaiian county. Generally no
William Meheula Yes Yes Yes No

Table 4.5 STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE  

Leadership and Governmental Positions

Leaders Q6. Can non-Hawaiian citizens hold leadership positions in the Hawaiian nation? In what capacity? Q7. Can non-Hawaiian citizens hold governmental positions in the Hawaiian nation? In what capacity?
Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i To be determined in a Hawaiian convention. Personally, she doesn't see this happening. To be determined in a Hawaiian convention. Non-Hawaiians would probably hold similar positions as they do in OHA today.
William Meheula Not in the immediate future. In the context of a state-within-a-state, "Hawaiians must lead first." Yes. They could hold consultant positions if they are the most qualified.


Table 4.5 pertains to non-Hawaiian citizens holding leadership and governmental positions in the state-within-a-state. Both leaders interviewed did not see non-Hawaiians holding leadership positions, at least in the near future. They were both more receptive to non-Hawaiians holding governmental and consultant positions, such as they do today in OHA, and if they are qualified for these positions.

Table 4.6 STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE  

Transitional Stage/Privileges

Leaders Q8. What is the primary role of non-Hawaiians within the transitional stage of your model? Q9. Would long-time non-Hawaiian residents and non-Hawaiians born and raised in Hawai'i be granted any special privileges as citizens of the Hawaiian nation?
Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i "All ethnic groups should educate themselves" to understand the history of where they live and to know about the losses Hawaiians have endured. To be determined in a Hawaiian convention
William Meheula To understand that Hawaiian claims are valid and just. Non-Hawaiians should "support and help Hawaiians receive just compensation from the U.S. government." To be determined in a Hawaiian convention

Table 4.6 looks at the primary role of non-Hawaiians in the transitional stage of the Hawaiian county, and whether long-time non-Hawaiian residents would receive any special privileges as citizens. The responses from both leaders regarding roles were based on Hawaiian history. Non-Hawaiians should learn more about Hawaiian history in order to know about the losses Native Hawaiians have had to endure for decades, and, consequently, to realize that Hawaiian claims today are valid and just. Both leaders indicated the issue of special privileges would be determined in a Hawaiian convention.

Table 4.7 examines how certain benefits of non-Hawaiian citizens would be affected in the Hawaiian county, and if the leaders had plans to implement similar programs. The primary consensus among the leaders in this table was that pensions, social security and Medicare benefits of non-Hawaiians would not be affected in the state-within-a-state.

Table 4.7 STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE  

Benefits

Q10. How are the pensions, social security and Medicare benefits of non-Hawaiian citizens affected in the Hawaiian nation? Do you have a plan to implement similar programs?

Leaders Pensions? Social Security? Medicare? Implement Programs?
Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i Pensions would not be affected since these are contracts with employers. Citizens of the Hawaiian county will always receive benefits. Citizens of the Hawaiian county will always receive benefits. Health care programs would intertwine Hawaiian and Western forms of health care.
William Meheula Not affected Not affected Not affected ?


Table 4.8 STATE-WITHIN-A-STATE  

Immigration/Tourism

Leaders Q11. What are your views on immigration? Can non-Hawaiians immigrate to Hawai'i and become citizens of the Hawaiian nation? Q12. What are your views on tourism? Would tourism remain an economic market? In what capacity?
Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i The current immigration policy in the state of Hawai'i would not change. A Hawaiian convention would determine whether non-Hawaiians, who immigrate to Hawai'i, could become citizens of the Hawaiian country. Tourism would remain an economic market in the state of Hawai'i but must be downscaled. Tourism within the Hawaiian county would be determined in a Hawaiian convention.
William Meheula Non-Hawaiians who immigrate to Hawai'i could not automatically become citizens. He stressed that overpopulation in Hawai'i is already a major problem. Tourism as an economic market within the Hawaiian entity would be determined in a Hawaiian convention.

Table 4.8 discusses the leaders' views on immigration and tourism, whether non-Hawaiians can immigrate to and become citizens of the Hawaiian county, and if tourism would remain an economic market in Hawai'i or become a market in the state-within-a-state. There was no obvious consensus among the leaders concerning the issue of immigration. Both leaders agreed that tourism as an economic market within the Hawaiian county or entity would be determined in a Hawaiian convention.

The Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement:
Roles of and Impacts on Non-Hawaiians

By Anthony Castanha, August 1996


<-- CHAPTER 3
HISTORY OF MOVEMENT
CONTENTS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

CHAPTER 5
NATION-WITHIN-A-NATION
-->

1 Hui Na'auao, "Models of Sovereignty-Critical Analysis," December 1994.
[return to text]

2 Office of Hawaiian Affairs, "Ho'olahui hou (Re-building a nation)," Ka Wai Ola O OHA, December 1994, p. 10.
[return to text]

3 Ibid.
[return to text]

4 Hui Na'auao, "Models of Sovereignty-Critical Analysis," December 1994.
[return to text]

5 Office of Hawaiian Affairs, "Ho'olahui hou," Ka Wai Ola O OHA, December 1994, p. 10.
[return to text]

6 Pat Omandam, "In Search of a Nation: Which of the roads will Hawaiians take to sovereignty?" Honolulu Star-Bulletin, August 24, 1995.
[return to text]

7 Interview with Kina'u Boyd Kamali'i, November 13, 1995.
[return to text]

8 Interview with William Meheula, December 15, 1995.
[return to text]

The Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement:
Roles of and Impacts on Non-Hawaiians

By Anthony Castanha, August 1996


<-- CHAPTER 3
HISTORY OF MOVEMENT
CONTENTS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

CHAPTER 5
NATION-WITHIN-A-NATION
-->